Mathew Associates Hook-Up And Weld Services v. Gol Offshore Ltd Through Official Liquidator (In Liqn) And ANR

19-ca608-18.doc vai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.608 OF 2018 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.756 OF 2014 Mathew Associates Hook-up & Weld Service ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Export Bank of India

...Petitioner

V/s.

The Official Liquidator of - GOL Offshore Ltd. (In Liqn.) & Anr.

...Respondents

Ms.Sneha Patil i/b M/s.Maniar Srivastava Associates for the Applicant.

Mr.S.P. Bharti for the Respondent No.2.

Mr.Mahendhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for the Official Liquidator present.

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE : 12TH DECEMBER, 2019.

P.C. :- 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that in view of subsequent events, this company application does not survive and has become infructuous. Statement is accepted. 2.

The company application is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Mr.Bharti, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 in this company application states that the applicant shall file an affidavit in this Court to the effect that the applicant has complied with 1/2

19-ca608-18.doc the order dated 26th April, 2018 passed by this Court in Company Application (Lodging) No.86 of 2018 and has released the payment to various parties pursuant to the said order dated 26th April, 2018 while withdrawing the amount deposited by the respondent no.2. Learned counsel undertakes that her client shall file such affidavit within two weeks from today and shall serve a copy thereof upon the learned counsel for the respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 is directed to file affidavit within two weeks from today which shall indicate whether any further amount is payable by the respondent no.2 to the company in liquidation arising out of the project in hand and whether any amount is disbursed by the respondent no.2 insofar as the company in liquidation. If the respondent no.2 has to recover any amount from the company in liquidation, such also can be indicated in such affidavit proposed to be filed. 4.

The company application is disposed of on aforesaid terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.) 2/2