Ishaa Atul Jogani And ANR v. University Of Mumbai And 3 Others And Bar Council Of Maharashtra And ANR. (Opponents)

suresh 903-NMW-451.2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.451 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2009 OF 2017 Ishaa Atul Jogani & Anr.

.... Applicants In the matter between Ishaa Atul Jogani & Anr.

.... Petitioners Vs.

University of Mumbai & Ors.

.... Respondents Mr. Mukesh M. Vashi, Senior Advocate, with Ms Panthi Desai i/by M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioners/ Applicants.

Mr. Rui Rodrigues for Respondent Nos.1 & 4.

Mr. Shriram A. Patil for Respondent No.2.

Mr. Himanshu B. Takke, AGP, for Respondent No.3. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 06, 2019 P.C:

1.

Having heard both sides and perusing the earlier order of this Court as also the annexures to the petition and the affidavits filed, we are of the view that subject to final orders in the main petition, the result of petitioner No.1 be declared and

suresh 903-NMW-451.2018.doc the mark-sheet be issued to her. The needful be done within 10 days. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

2.

It is clarified that this order is subject to the outcome of the writ petition and will not create any equities in favour of the petitioner.

3.

Notice of motion accordingly stands disposed of. (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)