Yogesh Dhirajlal Vora v. Reserve Bank Of India And 4 ORS.

Mhi WP-50-17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2017 Yogesh Dhirajlal Vora Petitioner

Versus

Reserve Bank of India Anr.

Respondents Mr.M.G.Agre, for the Petitioner.

Ms. Vaishali Bhilare, for respondent No.4.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,JJ.

DATE : 20th April, 2018.

P.C. :

Learned counsel for respondent No.4, at the outset, having taken instructions, makes a statement that respondent No.5 - Shri Sai Otto Tubes Mills Ltd. is already declared N.P.A. Statement is accepted.

2.

In the light of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No.4, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the grievance made in the petition no more survives. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. [SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.] [RANJIT MORE,J.]