← Library
Bombay High CourtAPP/118/2020disposed off

Rang Sharda Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. Marico Industries Limited.

2022-12-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram,Hon'Ble Justice Kamal Khata3 pages

Digitally signed by MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date:

2022.12.20 16:59:29 +0530 1/3 MEERA MAHESH JADHAV

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 117 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1938 OF 2020 WITH CHAMBER ORDER (L) NO.241 OF 2020 IN APPEAL NO.117 OF 2020 Rang Sharda Hotels Pvt Ltd.

....Appellant V/s.

Marico Industries Ltd.

...Respondents

WITH APPEAL NO. 118 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1942 OF 2020 WITH CHAMBER ORDER (L) NO.244 OF 2020 IN APPEAL NO.118 OF 2020 Rang Sharda Hotels Pvt Ltd.

....Appellant V/s.

Marico Industries Ltd.

...Respondents

WITH APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1947 OF 2020 WITH CHAMBER ORDER (L) NO.245 OF 2020 IN APPEAL NO.120 OF 2020 Rang Sharda Hotels Pvt Ltd.

....Appellant V/s.

Kanji Moorarji & Anr

...Respondents

WITH APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1939 OF 2020 WITH

2/3 CHAMBER ORDER (L) NO.243 OF 2020 IN APPEAL NO.121 OF 2020 Rang Sharda Hotels Pvt Ltd.

....Appellant V/s.

Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. & Anr

...Respondents

WITH APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1937 OF 2020 WITH CHAMBER ORDER (L) NO.242 OF 2020 IN APPEAL NO.122 OF 2020 Rang Sharda Hotels Pvt Ltd.

....Appellant V/s.

Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. & Anr

...Respondents

WITH APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1951 OF 2020 WITH CHAMBER ORDER (L) NO.240 OF 2020 IN APPEAL NO.123 OF 2020 Rang Sharda Hotels Pvt Ltd.

....Appellant V/s.

Kanji Moorarji & Anr

...Respondents

---- None for Appellants.

Mr. Ramchandran Narayanan i/b Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondents in all the appeals.

Ms Sheeta Metakari i/b Mr. Sunil Sonawane for BMC. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & KAMAL KHATA JJ DATED : 19th DECEMBER 2022

3/3 P.C. :

When the matter was called out, someone claiming to be from the administration department of appellant appeared and wanted to tender a letter seeking some two months time. Court informed the said person that they are not inclined to take the letter on record and atleast the Director of the company, if not advocate, should come to the court and step into the witness box and make a statement. We stood over the matter and directed the said person to ask the Director to remain present at 4.30 p.m. At 4.30 p.m., when the matter was again called out nobody appeared for appellants. All appeals dismissed.

Consequently, interim applications, if any pending, also stand disposed.

Chamber orders also stands disposed.

(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)