← Library
Bombay High CourtS/430/2017disposed off

Nimisha Charan Sharma And ANR v. Aditi Vikas Bagadia And ANR

2017-09-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sanklecha2 pages

Suit 430 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT No. 430 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1271 OF 2017 IN SUIT No. 430 OF 2017 Nimisha Charan Sharma and Anr.

...Plaintiffs Vs.

Aditi Vikas Bagadia and Anr.

...Defendants *********** Mr. Vishesh Kalra i/b. Vidhi Partners for Plaintiffs. Mr. Jairam Chandani i/b. Lexim Associates for Defendants Ms.Nimisha Charan Sharma , Plaintiff No.1 present in person Ms. Veena Chandra Sharma, Plaintiff No.2 present in person Ms. Aditi Sharma, Defendant No.1 present in person Ms. Kokila Sharma, Defendant No.2 present in person *********** CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA, J.

DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2017.

P.C:- 1.

The Plaintiffs and Defendants belong to the same family and the present dispute is related to the estate of the deceased Mr. Satish Indra Sharma, who was the brother of the Plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and father of Defendant No.1 and husband of Defendant No.2. 2.

The parties have reached at a settlement in terms of the consent terms dated 22.9.2017, tendered in Court today. The consent terms are signed by the Plaintiffs and the Defendants, who are present in the Court. Tikam

Suit 430 of 2017 The advocates for the Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.1 and 2 state that they identify their clients Plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and Defendant Nos.1 and 2 respectively and also their signatures to the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for the purpose of identification. 3.

The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Refund of Court fee as per rules. Notice of motion taken out by the Plaintiffs being Notice of Motion No. 1271 of 2017 also stands disposed of as infructuous. (M. S. SANKLECHA,J.) Tikam