Sangeeta Bhimnath Surve v. State Of Maharashtra And 4 ORS

39 wp3235-22.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date: 2023.03.14 15:37:44 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 3235 OF 2022 Sangeeta Bhimnath Surve ..... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

..... Respondents Mr.Shailesh K. More for the Petitioner Mr.Milind V. More, Addl. G.P. for the State

CORAM:

S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATED :

MARCH 13, 2023 P.C.

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2.

The learned counsel submits that the Petitioner was granted permanency. The said judgment was upheld by this court. Pensionary benefits are not paid to the Petitioner. The learned counsel submits that the Petitioner has given representation. The same is not yet decided.

3.

We have heard the learned A.G.P. also.

4.

In case, representation of the Petitioner for grant of pension (page 57) is pending with Respondent no.3 and if Respondent no.3 is competent authority, the same shall be decided expeditiously, Mohite 1/2

39 wp3235-22.docx preferably within three months on its own merits. 5.

Writ Petition is disposed of.

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Mohite 2/2