Anil Saroj Sole Prop. Of M/S Saroj Associates v. Smt Radhadevi Ramji Singh And 4 ORS

33-CHS7-17.DOC Arun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 7 OF 2017 IN SUIT NO. 1430 OF 2008 Anil Saroj, Sole Proprietor of Saroj Associates ...Applicant/ Plaintiff

Versus

Radhadevi R Singh & Ors ...Defendants Mr KT Kukreja, i/b MGS Legal, for the Applicant/Plaintiff.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

8th April 2019 PC:- 1.

The Chamber Summons is for amendment. It has been served a long time ago. There is a delay of 3134 days in applying for amendment.

2.

Mr Kukreja explains that the need for the amendment was realised only when the Plaintiff changed Advocates. The amendments in any case do not alter the cause of action. In fact the amendment is necessary because it makes an important correction where instead of a figure of Rs.3.26 crores payable by the Plaintiff to the Defendants, the amount is corrected to be read as R.3.51 crores, 8th April 2019

33-CHS7-17.DOC a benefit of about Rs.25 lakhs to the Defendants. The Defendants can have no objection to this. This is why they have filed no Reply to the Chamber Summons.

3.

The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendments to be carried out within three weeks from today.

4.

All concerned will act on production of authenticated copy of this order.

(G. S. PATEL, J) 8th April 2019