Uday N. Murudkar v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And 2 ORS.

15. WP 1892.18.doc JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1892 OF 2018 Uday N. Murudkar.

... Petitioner.

V/s.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.

... Respondents.

Mr. Sanjeev Sawant i/b. Mr. Abhishek P. Deshmukh for the Petitioner.

Mr. Suresh S. Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. Trupti Puranik for the MCGM.

Mr. Madhukar Khade, A.O. (Establishment) of Respondent No.1 present in Court.

CORAM : R.M. Borde and V.M. Deshpande, JJ.

DATE : 23rd July, 2018.

P.C. :- The challenge raised in the instant Petition in respect of the order directing compulsory retirement of the Petitioner need not be gone into and the Petitioner agrees for the aforesaid in view of the statement made on behalf of Respondent No.1 by Mr. Madhukar Khade, Administrative Officer (Establishment), to the effect that the

15. WP 1892.18.doc departmental proceedings initiated against the Petitioner would not be proceeded further and the departmental enquiry proceedings would stand dropped in view of the order of compulsory retirement issued against the Petitioner. It is also further directed that the Petitioner shall be entitled to the retiral benefits as permissible in law and the monetary benefits shall be paid to the Petitioner by Respondent No.1 as expeditiously as possible preferably within period of six months from today. The Petitioner shall also be entitled to draw pension in accordance with the relevant rules. 2.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(V.M. Deshpande, J.) (R. M. Borde, J.) Jyoti Prakash Pawar by Jyoti Prakash Pawar Date:

2018.07.25 11:13:22 +0530