Prtect Equity Advisors Pvt. Ltd. v. -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 371 OF 2015 In the matter of Companies Act, 1956 or any re- enactment thereof;

AND In the matter of Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 or any re-enactment thereof;

AND In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation amongst Indian Direct Equity Advisors Private Limited & Pro Capital Advisors Private Limited & Protect Equity Advisors Private Limited & their respective shareholders and creditors under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Protect Equity Advisors Private Limited ) [CIN: U65990MH1990PTC057825] ) a company incorporated under the ) Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office ) at A/12, Technocrat Society, Twin Tower Lane, ) Prabhadevi, Mumbai 400 025 ) ....Applicant Company

CALLED SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION FOR HEARING Ms. Labdhi Shah, Advocate for the Applicant Company Coram: S.J. Kathawalla, J.

Dated: 8th May, 2015 MINUTES OF ORDER UPON the Application of the Applicant Company above named by the Company Summons for Direction and upon hearing Ms. Labdhi Shah, Advocate instructed by the Applicant Company AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated 23rdDecember, 2014 of Mrs. Shaila Kulkarni, Director of the Applicant Company, in support of the Company Summons for Direction and the Exhibits referred therein, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1) The convening and holding the meeting of Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company for the purpose of considering, and if thought fit, approving, with or without modification(s), the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation amongst Indian Direct Equity Advisors Private Limited, Pro Capital Advisors Private Limited and Protect Equity Advisors Private Limited and their respective shareholders and creditors, is dispensed with, in view of the consent given by all the Four Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company, which are annexed as Exhibits "D-1" to "D-4" to the Affidavit in support of the Company Summons for Direction.

2) There are no Secured Creditors of the Applicant Company as stated in paragraph 22 of the Affidavit in support of the Company Summons for Direction. Hence, the question of convening and holding the meeting of Secured Creditors of the Applicant Company does not arise.

3) There are no Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company as stated in paragraph 23 of the Affidavit in support of the Company Summons for Direction.

Hence, the question of convening and holding the meeting of Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company does not arise. (S.J.Kathawalla, J.)