Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Hindustan Industries

908-NMS70-17+.DOC ATUL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 70 OF 2017 IN SUIT NO. 36 OF 2017 WITH LEAVE PETITION NO. 375 OF 2016 Hindustan Unilever Limited ...Plaintiffs

Versus

Hindustan Industries ...Defendants Ms. Akshata Kamath, with Ms. Chitra Sundar, i/b M/s. W.S. Kane & Co., for the Plaintiffs.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

13th January 2017 PC:- 1.

There was an ad-interim order dated 15th December 2016. The Defendants have been served. There is an Affidavit of Service. None appears.

2.

In view of this, and for the reasons set out therein, the Leave Petition is made absolute.

13th January 2017

908-NMS70-17+.DOC 3.

For the reasons set out in the order dated 15th December 2016, it is confirmed as the final order on the Notice of Motion. In addition, now that leave has been granted, there will be an order in terms of prayer clause (b).

4.

The Notice of Motion is made absolute with costs. In addition, the Plaintiffs will be entitled to recover the actual costs of this Notice of Motion at the final hearing of the Suit. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 13th January 2017