The Commissioner Of Central Excise Mumbai Iv v. M/S Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd. (Auto Division)

suresh 14-NMA-208.2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.208 OF 2017 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.275 OF 2016 Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-IV .... Applicant In the matter between Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-IV .... Appellant Vs.

M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (Auto Division) .... Respondent Ms P.S. Cardozo with Mr. Vipul Bajpayee for the Applicant/Appellant.

Mr. Sachin Chitnis i/by Ms Padmavati Patil for the Respondent.

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 13, 2017 P.C:

1.

Having heard both sides and finding that the delay has been reasonably explained, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs.

suresh 14-NMA-208.2017.doc 2.

All other office objections will be complied with within four weeks.

(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)