Sitaram S.Singhi v. Satyanmeenu Sitaram Singhi (Pro. Petitioner)

Kavita 30-cst-32-17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.32 OF 2017 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.440 OF 2008 Sitaram S. Singhi ... Petitioner (Since deceased) And Mrs. Meenu Sitaram Singhi ... Proposed Petitioner .....

Mr. Dinesh P. Guchiya for Petitioner / Applicant. .....

CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 22nd MARCH 2017 P.C. :

1.

Heard Learned Counsel for Petitioner and also considered the Affidavit in support. For reasons mentioned therein and in view of the statement made by the Counsel for the Petitioner that the persons mentioned at para No.3 (ii), (iii) and (iv) in the affidavit in support, are the children of the Applicant and have agreed to give consent to the affidavit,

Kavita 30-cst-32-17.doc Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).

2.

Chamber Summons accordingly disposed of.

3.

The amendment to be carried out within 3 weeks from today .

( K.R.SHRIRAM,J)