Nikunj Developers v. Union In India And 4 ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3286 OF 2018 Dinesh Kumar Agrawal.

.. Petitioner.

Versus

Union of India and Others.

..Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 488 OF 2019 Nikunj Developers.

.. Petitioner.

Versus

Union of India and Others.

..Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2773 OF 2019 Gautam Chemburkar.

.. Petitioner.

Versus

Union of India and Others.

..Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1853 OF 2022 Sugee Developers Pvt Ltd.

.. Petitioner.

Versus

Union of India and Others.

..Respondents.

**** Mr. Dinesh Agrawal, Petitioner-in-person in WP No. 3286 of 2018 not present.

Mr. Marmik Kamdar i/b Khaitan & Co., for the Petitioner in WP No. 2773 of 2019.

Mr. Rishab Jain i/b UBR Legal for the Petitioner in WP No. 488 of 2019.

1 of SACHIN RAMCHANDRA PATIL by SACHIN RAMCHANDRA PATIL Date:

2023.03.01 16:15:42 +0530

Ms. Ginita Bodani, Mr. Srey Bhardwaj i/b Economic Laws Practice for the Petitioner in WP No. 1853 of 2022.

Mr. J. B. Mishra, Ms. Maya Majumdar, Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Ms. Genevieve Fernandes for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 in WP Nos. 3286 of 2018 and 2773 of 2019 and for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in WP No. 488 of 2019.

Mr. J. B. Mishra and Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh for the Respondents in WP No. 1853 of 2022.

**** CORAM :

NITIN JAMDAR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

DATE :

24 FEBRUARY 2023.

P. C. :

As regards Writ Petition No.3286 of 2018 is concerned, the Petitioner-in-person is not present. We are informed on his behalf that the Petitioner wants to amend the petition to incorporate necessary prayers and pleadings. Similar request for amendment is made by learned counsel for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2773 of 2019. Stand over to 20 March 2023, to be listed under the caption "For Directions" so that amendments are carried out before the next date and reply, if any, of the Respondents to the amended petition is filed. Reverification is not dispensed with as amendments contain factual assertions.

2.

As regards Writ Petition No.488 of 2019 is concerned, learned 2 of

counsel for the Petitioner states that no instructions are being received and the email seeking discharge is also not responded to. It appears that the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.488 of 2019 has lost interest in the petition and therefore the same is dismissed for non prosecution. 3.

As regards Writ Petition No. 1853 of 2022 is concerned, the Petitioner tenders affidavit in rejoinder.

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) 3 of