Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Jai Industries Chemical Udyog

925-NMSL3517-16.DOC ATUL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 3517 OF 2016 IN SUIT (L) NO. 1129 OF 2016 WITH LEAVE PETITION NO. 389 OF 2016 Hindustan Unilever Limited ...Plaintiffs

Versus

Jai Industries Chemical Udyog ...Defendants Ms Akshata Kamath, with Ms Anusha Ramanathan, i/b WS Kane & Co, for the Plaintiffs.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

20th January 2017 PC:- I.

LEAVE PETITION (L) NO. 379 OF 2016 1.

For the reasons set out in the Petition, it is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

20th January 2017

925-NMSL3517-16.DOC II.

NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 3517 OF 2017 2.

For the reasons set out in the ad-interim order dated 19th December 2016, it is confirmed as the final order on the Notice of Motion. Now that the leave has been granted, there will also be an order in terms of prayer clause (b) of the Notice of Motion. 3.

The Notice of Motion is made absolute in these terms with costs.

4.

In addition, the Plaintiffs will be entitled to recover the actual costs of the Notice of Motion at the time of final hearing of the Notice of Motion.

(G. S. PATEL, J.) 20th January 2017