Jaswantlal J Shah v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-32, Mumbai

31-18-NMA-C-17=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 31 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2596 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 32 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2595 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 33 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2597 OF 2017 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 34 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2598 OF 2017 Jaswantlal J. Shah .. Applicant In the matter between Jaswantlal J. Shah .. Appellant v/s.

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, Circle 32, Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. Rajeev Kumar for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Ashok Kotangle a/w Ms. Padma Divakar for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.J.

DATED : 16th FEBRUARY, 2018.

P.C.

1.

These four Motions seeks condonation of 2 day delay in filing the accompanying appeals from the common order dated 8th May, 2017 Uday S. Jagtap

31-18-NMA-C-17=.doc passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

2.

We have perused the affidavits in support of the motions and are satisfied that the delay has been sufficiently explained. 3.

Accordingly, all the four Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) Uday S. Jagtap