← Library
Bombay High CourtITXA/802/2018withdrawn

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Pune v. Suma Shilpa Ltd.

2018-08-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sanklecha2 pages

Uday S. Jagtap 802-18-ITXA-907=.doc ]THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 802 OF 2018 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 .. Appellant v/s.

M/s. Suma Shilp Ltd.

..Respondent Mr. Sham V. Walve for the appellant None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.

DATED : 9th AUGUST, 2018.

P.C.

1.

This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 2011-12. 2.

Mr. Walve, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue invited our attention to Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018 issued by the Central Board for Direct Tax (CBDT). The above Circular directs the Officers of the Revenue not to file appeals to the High Court where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs. It also directs its Officers to withdraw / not press its pending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. This, of course, if it does not fall in the excluded class of appeals listed therein.

3.

Our attention is invited to para 13 of the Appeal Memo, which Digitally signed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date:

2018.08.13 10:53:43 +0530 Uday Shivaji Jagtap indicates that in this Appeal, the tax effect is Rs.48.74 lakhs.

Uday S. Jagtap 802-18-ITXA-907=.doc 4.

In view of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018 issued by the CBDT, Mr. Walve, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue, on instructions from Mr. Deepak Soni, Income Tax Officer for the office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, does not press the present Appeal.

5.

Accordingly, Appeal dismissed, as withdrawn.

6.

Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)