Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Suraj Nanukumar Jadav

V. A. Tikam 168-EXA-1763-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1763 OF 2022 Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited ...Applicant Vs.

Suraj Nanukumar Jadav

...Respondent

...

Mrs. Sharmila Wakshe i/b. M.Kolamkar for Applicant Mrs. Smita Bhosale, Authorized Representative of Applicant ...

CORAM

: SHYAM C. CHANDAK J.

[HEAD OF THE PANEL] H. M. BHOSALE [REGISTRAR - JUDICIAL-I - (MEMBER)] P. A. PATKI [DEPUTY - REGISTRAR - (MEMBER)] DATED : 9TH DECEMBER, 2023

ORDER

1.

Ms.Smita Bhosale, the Authorized Representative of the decree holder viz. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. is present. 2.

Ms.Smita Bhosale has placed on record the original Authority Letter, whereby he has been authorized as a representative on behalf of the decree holder/Applicant.

3.

The learned Advocate on behalf of the Applicant/ decree holder under the instructions of representative submitted that the 1/2

V. A. Tikam 168-EXA-1763-2022.doc Applicant- Finance Company desires to withdraw the Execution Application voluntarily.

4.

In terms of statement made by the learned Advocate along with the Authorized Representative, Execution Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

5.

The copies of Authority Letter and Identity Card of Authorized Representative shall be kept in the matter. 6.

The amount, if any deposited, the Decree Holder is at liberty to withdraw the same.

7.

The Court fee, if any, liable to be refunded, be refunded as per rules.

[P. A. PATKI] [H. M. BHOSALE] [SHYAM C. CHANDAK J.] Member Head of the Panel Member 2/2