The Commissioner Of Service Tax-Iii, Mumbai v. Vodafone India Ltd.

p2 NMA 466 OF 2016.doc vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.466 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO.112 OF 2015 The Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai III Commissionerate .... Applicant.

V/s.

M/s Vodafone India Ltd.

.... Respondent Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, a/w Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra, for the Applicant. Mr. Mrunal Parekh i/by M/s Duttmenon Dunmorr Sett for the Respondent. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.

DATE : 2 nd MAY, 2016.

P.C. :

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the affidavit in support, we are satisfied that there is sufficient cause made out for the delay and equally for non removal of the office objections in time. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). No order as to costs. [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] 1/1