← Library
Bombay High CourtNMW/1/2018

Capt. S. C. S. Adhikari v. Capt. Digvijay Singh And 2 ORS.

2018-04-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar3 pages

DDR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 75 OF 2017 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 72 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2445 OF 2013 Capt. S.C.S. Adhikari

...Petitioner

(Org. Petitioner No.1) Vs.

Capt. Digvijay Singh & ors.

...Respondents

(Resp.No.1 org.Pet.No.2 Resp.No.2 & 3 Org.Res) WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 75 OF 2017 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 72 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2445 OF 2013 Capt. S.C.S. Adhikari ...Applicant (Org.Petitioner)

IN THE MATTER OF

Capt. S.C.S. Adhikari

...Petitioner

(Org. Petitioner No.1) Vs.

Capt. Digvijay Singh & ors.

...Respondents

(Resp.No.1 org.Pet.No.2 Resp.No.2 & 3 Org.Res) Ms. Neeta Karnik for petitioner.

Ms. Pooja Jalan for respondent No.1.

Ms. S.V. Bharucha a/w. Mr. Dushyant Kumar for respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

1/3

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : 12th APRIL, 2018.

P.C. :

Having heard learned Counsel for the applicant on Notice of Motion seeking condonation of delay in filing review petition. We are satisfied that there is sufficient cause for not filing review petition in time. In the circumstances, we condone the delay in filing review petition. The Notice of Motion is disposed of.

2.

Also heard learned Counsel for the parties on review petition.

3.

For the reasons stated in the review petition, we set aside the order dated 24/7/2017 passed in Contempt Petition No. 72 of 2016 and Contempt Petition No.72 of 2016 is deserves to be recalled and the same is hereby recalled. 4.

The Contempt Petition be now listed on 22 nd June, 2018.

2/3

5.

The reply on the Contempt Petition be filed by the respondents within four weeks.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) 3/3