Tata Motors Ltd v. Rasul Shaikh And ANR

1/1 26.N-1708-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY AND ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NO.1708 OF 2016 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.754 OF 2016 Tata Motors Limited ....Applicant/Claimant Vs.

Rasul Shaikh and Anr.

....Respondents ---- Ms. B.R. Mangle for applicant/claimant.

None for respondent.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 13th DECEMBER 2018 P.C.:

Respondent no.1 has not been served because the packet has come back with the endorsement "left". So far as respondent no.2 is concerned, the packet has come back in August 2016 with the endorsement "insufficient address" though in the affidavit of service it is stated "Not known and intimation".

Therefore, execution application dismissed. So also notice. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad