Mehrunissa Saidu Shaikh v. The Union Of India And 7 ORS

1 / 2 921-WPL-3975-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3975 OF 2018 Mehrunissa Saidu Shaikh .... Petitioner versus The Union of India & Ors.

... Respondents .......

• Mr.Ranjit Bhosale a/w Rakesh Agrawal, Advocate for Petitioner.

• Mrs. S.V. Bharucha a/w A. Garge, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

• Mr.Anoop Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.5. • Ms.Asha N. i/b. Diamondwala & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.6.

• Mr.Abhay Patki, AGP for Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4. CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2018.

P.C. :

1.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner fairly states that though Letter of Intent has been issued in 2012 notice issued SRA is received by Petitioner now. According to him title to subject land may vest in Union of India and in that event entire rehabilitation project may be faulted with. If that happens, Petitioner Nesarikar

2 / 2 921-WPL-3975-18.odt shall be stranded in alternate accommodation for indefinite time.

2.

After six years we are not inclined to look into such contention. The slum rehabilitation project has been sanctioned as per provisions of law and no such objection has been raised at that juncture. However, keeping the contentions of Petitioner open and with liberty to Petitioner to approach the Court if any such contingencies arise, we dispose of the Petition. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)