Madhuri Sudhir Joglekar (Through Constituted Power Of Attorney) Satyajeet Mehra v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle - 1, Pune

ITXAL2287_19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2019 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) (L)NO.2287 OF 2019 Madhuri Sudhir Joglekar (through Constituted Applicant / Power of Attorney) Satyajeet Mehra ...

Appellant Vs.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Pune ...

Respondent Mr. Aditya Andhorikar for Applicant / Appellant. Mr. Sham Walve a/w. Mr. P. Chatterji for Respondent. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN, MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 05, 2020 P.C. :

Heard Mr. Andhorikar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Walve, learned standing counsel Revenue for the respondent. 2.

This interim application has been filed for condoning the delay of 137 days in filing the related appeal by the applicant. 3.

Be it stated that the related appeal has been filed by the applicant as the appellant under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 28.12.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench, SMC, Pune in I.T.A.No.3012/PUN/2017 for the assessment year 2013-14.

4.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the averments made in the interim application. We have also considered the grounds urged in the related memo of appeal and the proposed substantial question of law.

5.

On due consideration, we are of the view that applicant has shown sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within time. Consequently, the delay in filing the related appeal is condoned. 6.

Interim application is disposed of.

(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.) 1/1 Minal Parab Minal V.

Parab Minal V. Parab Date: 2020.02.05 17:38:49 +0530