Pidilite Industries Ltd v. Aipl Marketing Pvt.Ltd And ANR

906-NMS-1660-2016.DOC JSN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LEAVE PETITION NO. 14 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1660 OF 2016 IN SUIT NO. 417 OF 2016 Pidilite Industries Limited ...Plaintiff

Versus

AIPL Marketing Private Limited and Another ...Defendants Mr. Hiren Kamod, with Ms. Vrushali Maindad i/b A.A. Desai for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Dhiren Karania, i/b G.S. Hegde and V.A. Bhagat for the Defendants Nos. 1 and 2.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

17th October 2016 PC:- 1.

By consent, the Leave Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

2.

The Suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are signed by the authorised signatories of the parties. The authorised signatories are present in Court. The Consent Terms are also signed by the Advocates on behalf of the parties.

17th October 2016

906-NMS-1660-2016.DOC 3.

Having seen the Consent Terms, I am satisfied that they are not contrary to law and reflect the parties' true intentions and have been drawn by the parties of their own volition. 4.

The Consent Terms are taken are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court. The Suit is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

5.

The drawn up decree is dispensed with. However, if for the purpose of implementation of these Consent Terms, should the parties require a drawn up decree, they will be entitled to apply to the Department for one without having to make a separate application in that behalf and on production of an authenticated copy of this order. Drawn up decree is to be strictly in accordance with these Consent Terms only.

6.

In view of this, the pending Notice of Motion does not survive and is disposed of.

7.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 17th October 2016