Phoenix Arc Pvt Ltd v. Dharmesh Balubhai Dhakan

34, 35, 37.doc Tauseef

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.150 OF 2016 Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd.

...Applicant V/S.

Dharmesh Balubhai Dhakan

...Respondent

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.151 OF 2016 Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd.

...Applicant V/S.

Santosh Tatyaba Phadtare

...Respondent

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.153 OF 2016 Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd.

...Applicant V/S.

Lawrence Masilamani Chettiar

...Respondent

Ms. Meghna Gowalani, Advocate for Applicants.

CORAM

: G.S. KULKARNI, J.

DATED : 07th FEBRUARY 2020.

P.C. :

1.

These Execution Applications have not been proceeded with for a period of over 12 months from the date of filing of the applications. Accordingly, these applications have been placed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master under Rule 329 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules before the Court, for dismissal, for want of prosecution. Pg 1 of 2

34, 35, 37.doc 2.

Learned counsel for the applicants/claimants however seeks time to take appropriate steps within two weeks from today. 3.

In the event appropriate steps are not taken within two weeks, applications stands disposed of with liberty to file a fresh application as an when necessary as may be permissible in law. 4.

If appropriate steps are taken, office to list these applications as per C.M.I.S. date.

(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) Pg 2 of 2