State Bank Of India v. The Adjudicating Officer And Principal Secretary And 2 Others

3-NMW.517.2015.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 517 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1921 OF 2015 State Bank of India } Applicant versus The Adjudicating Officer and } Principal Secretary and Ors. } Respondents Mr. Vinay Bhorge i/b. M/s. Utangale and Co. for the applicant/petitioner.

None for the respondents.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATED :- APRIL 1, 2016 P.C. :- It is the petitioner State Bank of India who has filed writ petition in this court, but for some reasons, it could not comply with the procedural rules. The reasons that are set out in the affidavit are that the clerk in the office of M/s. Utangale and Company did not attend the registry's office and therefore, on account of his mistake, the petitioner/applicant should not suffer. 2) For these reasons, we set aside the order of the Prothonotary and Senior Master. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Now, the office objections shall be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA