Madhyavarti Samiti v. The State Of Maharashtra And 6 ORS And Muktabai Gangaram Rodala( Applicant)

6-NMW.549.2015+.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICES OF MOTION NOS. 549/2015, 550/2015, 551/2015, 552/2015, 869/2015, 903/2015, 927/2015, 15/2016, 17/2016 TO 33/2016, 35/2016, 37/2016 TO 50/2016, 58/2016, 59/2016, 61/2016, 63/2016, 64/2016, 65/2016, 68/2016, 69/2016, 72/2016, 74/2016, 76/2016, 86/2016, 87/2016, 89/2016, 90/2016, 91/2016 AND 93/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1029 OF 2015 Madhyavarti Samiti } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors.

} Respondents Ms. Manisha Gawde i/b. Mr. Y. E. Mooman for the applicants.

Ms. Madhubala Kajale - AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 2.

Mr. P. G. Lad with Ms. Aparna Murlidharan for respondent nos. 3,4 and 5.

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Ms.

Apeksha Sharma i/b. M/s. Kadam and Co.

for respondent no. 7.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATED :- APRIL 1, 2016 P.C. :- 1) After hearing all parties, we do not think that any relief can be granted on the notices of motion. They are moved in J.V.Salunke,PA

6-NMW.549.2015+.doc disposed of matter. Further, the amount that is deposited in this court cannot be withdrawn unconditionally. The complaint is that MHADA is yet to pass an order. Mr. Lad appearing on behalf of MHADA, on instructions, states that within a period of two weeks from today, MHADA will pass the requisite order. 2) In the light of the fact that the main writ petition is disposed of by accepting the statements of Mr. Lad as undertakings to this court, we dispose of the notices of motion as well. We reserve rights of the petitioners/applicants to claim such amounts as are permissible in law by way of appropriate proceedings.

3) All the notices of motion are disposed of accordingly. (G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA