Shri Suresh Ramchandra Nadkar v. Press Council Of India And 2 ORS.

911-RPW.24.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 24 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2369 OF 2015 Shri. Suresh Ramchandra } Nadkar } Petitioner versus Press Council of India } and Ors.

} Respondents Mr. Suresh R. Nadkar - petitioner in person.

None for the respondents.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATED :- JULY 15, 2016 P.C. :- 1) Having heard the party in person on this review petition, we are of the view that we cannot entertain it for entertaining this petition would mean permitting ourselves to indulge in an exercise which is far beyond the permissible limits of review jurisdiction.

2) In the garb of a review, we cannot re-hear the original cause. The remedy of an appeal, in the event the petitioners feel that our order is erroneous, is always available and can be availed J.V.Salunke,PA

911-RPW.24.2016.doc of. It is only a higher court which can arrive at a conclusion that our order has omitted from consideration very vital and crucial matters. In these circumstances, the review petition is devoid of merits and it is dismissed.

(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA