Purushottam Prabhulkar Narhari And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra And 2 ORS

915-WPL.3640.2015.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3640 OF 2015 Purushottam Prabhulkar Narhari } and Anr.

} Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra and Ors.

} Respondents Mr. Doodhnath Saroj for the petitioner.

Mr. J. S. Saluja - AGP for respondent nos.

1 and 2.

Mr. Shailendra Singh i/b. M/s. J. P.

Consultia for respondent no. 3.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATED :- MARCH 30, 2016 P.C. :- If the structures are already demolished and after the ad-interim relief was refused, then, the petition is rendered infructuous. If the petitioner has any other grievance and particularly in relation to any payment of the compensation in lieu of transit accommodation, the petitioner shall take that grievance with appropriate authority and equally with the developer. With liberty to pursue that grievance and claim, we dispose of this writ petition.

(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA