← Library
Bombay High CourtCOMAP/87/2023disposed off

Samir Narain Bhojwani v. Gautam Rajani

2023-08-30Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor3 pages

1 501 & 502-COMAP-86-2023.doc Digitally signed by WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Date:

2023.08.31 17:20:40 +0530 WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2023 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 12 OF 2021 IN COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO. 205 OF 2020 Samir Narain Bhojwani : Appellant/ Orig. Defendant Vs.

Kavita G. Rajani : Respondent/ Orig. Plaintiff WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 40368 OF 2022 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2023 AND COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 87 OF 2023 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 14 OF 2021 IN COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO. 211 OF 2020 Samir Narain Bhojwani : Appellant/ Orig. Defendant Vs.

Gautam Rajani : Respondent/ Orig. Plaintiff WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 40371 OF 2022 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 87 OF 2023

2 501 & 502-COMAP-86-2023.doc Mr. Parimal K. Shraff a/w Mr. D.V. Deokar and Mr. D. Parikh i/by Parimal K. Shraff & Co. for Appellant in Commercial Appeal No.86 of 2023 & Commercial Appeal No.87 of 2023. Mr. Swetank Soni, Power of Attorney of Appellant is present. Ms.Zahra Padamsee i/by Vashi & Vashi for Respondent in Commercial Appeal No.86 of 2023 & Commercial Appeal No.87 of 2023.

Ms. Kavita G Rajani, Respondent in Commercial Appeal No.86 of 2023 is present.

Mr. Gautam G. Rajani, Respondent in Commercial Appeal No.87 of 2023 is present.

CORAM :

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

DATE :

30th AUGUST, 2023 P.C. :

Parties have today tendered consent terms by which it is stated that the parties have resolved their disputes & differences in the captioned Suit. The consent terms have been signed by the Appellant (Original Defendant) and the Respondent (Original Plaintiff) as also their respective advocates.

2.

The Respondent is present in Court and the Power of Attorney Holder of the Appellant is also present in Court and have been identified by their respective advocates.

3 501 & 502-COMAP-86-2023.doc 3.

It is thus that the learned advocates request that the present Appeal be disposed of in terms of the consent terms handed in. The consent terms are therefore taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

4.

Appeal as also all interlocutory proceedings are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court.

5.

The Appeal and all interlocutory Applications are therefore disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)