Pradyumna Madhav Chaudhari v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:660-DB 13-CRIWP-5-24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5 OF 2024 Pradyumna Madhav Chaudhari ... Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ......

Mr. Shrimant Mundhe, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. A.R. Kale, APP for Respondents - State ......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 15th JANUARY, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Learned APP has pointed out that petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy of filing appeal under section 60 before the State Government/Divisional Commissioner. 2.

In that view of the matter, learned advocate for petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appeal.

3.

Permission granted.

4.

Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

5.

Needless to mention that time spent by petitioner in prosecuting the present writ petition be taken into consideration at the time of condonation of delay, if any. [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE S.P. Rane