Dinkar Laxmanrao Nannaware v. Sangita Suresh Nannaware And ORS

1 47-fa1205-04.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRAT APPEAL NO.1205 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7239 OF 2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4410 OF 2010 Dinkar s/o. Laxmanrao Nannaware and anr.

..Appellants

Versus

Smt.Sangita w/o. Suresh Nannaware and ors.

..Respondents -- Mr.Ramraje Deshmukh, advocate i/b. Mr.S.S.Thombre, advocate for appellants Mr.S.K.Shinde, advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 -- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : JANUARY 08, 2015 PER COURT :

Production allowed. Heard both sides.

2] Presence of respondent nos.3 to 6 is not necessary. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of as regards them.

2 47-fa1205-04.odt 3] Perused the report of learned Registrar (Judicial) confirming identify of the parties. The consent terms are accepted on record and marked as "X" for the purpose of identification. 4] The consent terms are verified with the parties. They agree to the same. In the circumstances, the consent terms are recorded. Decree be drawn in terms of the consent terms Exhibit "X", subject to the further orders regarding the investment of the amount, by learned Member of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, as were issued earlier in the impugned award. The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to the costs.

5] In view of disposal of the appeal, Civil Applications do not survive and stand disposed of. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp