Rajendra Chandrarao More v. The State Of Mah And ORS

{1} wp300712.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3007 OF 2012 Rajendra s/o Chandrarao More Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.V.P.Patil, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.D.Ghayal, AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ AND S.M.GAVHANE, J J.

DATE : 26th February, 2020.

P.C. :

On objection raised by the learned AGP that the grievance of the petitioner cannot be examined in the Public Interest Litigation and if he is aggrieved in the matter, he can avail appropriate remedy available in law, the learned advocate for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as per the law. Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.

S.M.GAVHANE Z.A.HAQ JUDGE JUDGE adb