← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/239/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Sudhakar Sopanrao Pukane v. Virchand Bajirao Karewar And Anothers

2018-06-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh2 pages

1 WP - 239-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 239 OF 2016 SUDHAKAR SOPANRAO PUKANE

VERSUS

VIRCHAND BAJIRAO KAREWAR AND AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Milind M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for petitioner Mr. P.A. Sawli, Advocate for respondent no.1 Ms. R.S. Bora, Advocate h/f. Mr. Satyajit Bora, Advocate for respondent no.2 ...

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 26-06-2018 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. On instructions from their respective clients, learned counsel reconcile to a situation, wherein instead of Town Planning Officer, Parbhani, Taluka Inspector of Land Records, Parbhani / District Inspector of Land Records, Parbhani would act as Court Commissioner. 2.

In view of the same, writ petition is disposed of with modification in the order dated 14-12-2015 passed by learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Parbhani on exhibit - 48 in regular civil suit no. 331 of 2012, words "The Town Planning Officer, Parbhani" stand replaced by words "Taluka Inspector of Land Records, Parbhani / District Inspector of Land Records, Parbhani." All other conditions in the

2 WP - 239-2016 said order, remain untouched.

3.

Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE arp/