Tukaram Dattoba Suryawanshi v. The Ausa Municipal Council Through Its Chief Officer

2024:BHC-AUG:704-DB 929-WP-349-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 349 OF 2024 TUKARAM DATTOBA SURYAWANSHI

VERSUS

THE AUSA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER ....

Mr. D. P. Palodkar, Advocate h/f Mr. Shaikh Tarek Mobin H., Advocate for Petitioner ....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE:11.01.2024 PER COURT :- 1.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner would tender an application to the Respondent seeking his indulgence for regularisation of the encroachment that has been committed by the Petitioner.

2.

We would loathe to entertain a Petition wherein a direction to regularise encroachment is sought under a Writ of Mandamus.

3.

This Petition is disposed off.

(( 2 )) 929-WP-349-2024 4.

If the Petitioner moves an application/representation to the Respondent or any Government Authority, it is for the said authority to deal with in as per the Rules and the policies applicable. We express no view on the contents of such an application/ representation.

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] SMS