Dagadu Rajaram Patil v. Bhaskar Rajaram Patil And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 SECOND APPEAL NO.347 OF 1993 WITH CA/3331/1993 IN SA/347/1993 DAGADU RAJARAM PATIL

VERSUS

BHASKAR RAJARAM PATIL AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rohit Dhongde h/f Mr. V. T. Choudhari Advocate for Respondents No.1, 3 and 4: Mr. S. V. Dixit ...

CORAM :

ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :

26/07/2023 PER COURT :

The learned Advocate for the appellant submits that he has received the letter on WhatsApp that the matter has been compromised between the parties, and on the basis of that letter, the learned Advocate for the appellant submits that nothing survives in the matter and it may be disposed of as infructuous. 2.

In view of the statement made by the learned Advocate for the appellant, the second appeal is disposed of as infructuous. Pending civil application stands disposed of.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-.