Pawan S/O Girdharilal Purohit And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 CriApln 36/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2016 Pawan s/o Girdharilal Purohit & Anr.

APPLICANTS V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

RESPONDENTS Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi, Advocate for the Applicants Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1 - State CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & INDIRA K. JAIN, JJ.

DATE : 15th February, 2016 PER COURT :

1.

Learned counsel for the Applicants states that the notice of Respondent No.2 is properly served and service-report is already filed before the Court. In view of this, there is service of notice on both respondents is complete.

2.

Heard. Perused the complaint. The complaint is mainly about non-payment of price of goods sold by the accused. The dispute

2 CriApln 36/2016 appears to be exclusively of civil nature, and therefore, application deserves to be allowed. Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'c'.

( INDIRA K. JAIN, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) srm/15/2/16