Kalpana Vijay Sapkale And Others v. Deepak Mugalikar And Another

cp8.15 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 8 OF 2015 IN WP/7480/2014 WITH CP/9/2015 IN WP/6878/2014 WITH CP/11/2015 IN WP/7256/2014 KALPANA VIJAY SAPKALE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

DEEPAK MUGALIKAR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Deshmukh Bhausaheb S. Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Vijay Sharma .....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 10th JUNE, 2015 P.C. :- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2.

Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel for respondents states that representation of the petitioners as per the order passed by this court is decided on 15.5.2015 and consequential orders pursuant thereto are also passed.

3.

Mr Deshmukh, the learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the said fact, however, states that the same has been decided belatedly.

cp8.15 -24.

Administrative exigencies are put forth for the delay caused in deciding the representations. The order of this court stands complied though belatedly hence contempt stands purged. The contempt petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

5.

Needless to state that if the petitioners are aggrieved by any order, they will have liberty to take up appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) rlj/