← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10055/2016admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Ashok Pundlik Dapake v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2024-06-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi2 pages

{1} ca10055-16.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10055 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.209 OF 2016 Ashok Pundlik Dapake APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mrs. S.G.Chincholkar h/f Mr. G.N.Chincholkar, Adv. for applicant Mr. V. S. Badakha, AGP for respondent - State Mr. M. C. Swami, Advocate for respondent No.2 .......

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7392OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.33396 OF 2015 Rajgir Dattagir Giri APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mrs. S.G.Chincholkar h/f Mr. G.N.Chincholkar, Adv. for applicant Mr. V. S. Badakha, AGP for respondent - State .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 21 st JUNE, 2024 ORDER :

1.

These civil applications are filed by applicants - claimants, seeking permission to prefer First Appeals as indigent persons. 2.

Report in this behalf was called from Collector, Nanded. By

{2} ca10055-16.doc communication dated 29th May, 2024, Collector, Nanded has reported that as per records available, applicants - claimants do not possess movable or immovable property.

3.

In this view of the matter, civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause "B".

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/ca10055-16.doc