← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/39/2016disposed off

Md.Abdul Khaleq Md.Mirad v. The State Of Maharashtra

2016-01-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.V. Nirgude,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice I.K. Jain4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.108 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.307 OF 2001 Mohammad Abdul Khaleq s/o. Mod. Mirad, Age 80 years, Occ. Nil, r/o. Old Mondha, Bhavani Nagar, House No.16, Galli No.1, Aurangabad ..Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Inspector, Police Station, Kranti Chowk, Aurangabad ..Respondent -- Mr.J.S.Ingle, advocate for applicant Mr.R.B.Bagul, APP for respondent - State -- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : JANUARY 07, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard both sides.

2] For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The applicant be released on fresh bail upon executing P.R. Bond in the sum

of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.Twenty Thousand) and also upon furnishing surety in the like amount. Humdast allowed.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.307 OF 2001 Mohammad Abdul Khaleq s/o. Mod. Mirad, Age 80 years, Occ. Nil, r/o. Old Mondha, Bhavani Nagar, House No.16, Galli No.1, Aurangabad ..Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Inspector, Police Station, Kranti Chowk, Aurangabad ..Respondent -- Mr.J.S.Ingle, advocate for applicant Mr.R.B.Bagul, APP for respondent - State -- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : JANUARY 07, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard both sides.

2] In view of the fact that the non-bailable warrant has already been executed, present application has become infructuous. Even present

application is filed after execution of the nonbailable warrant. In the circumstances, present application is disposed being infructuous.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp