Balasaheb Punjaji Tanpure v. Kishor Bhausaheb Wani And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 959 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10707 OF 2018 IN FAST/218/2018 BALASAHEB PUNJAJI TANPURE

VERSUS

KISHOR BHAUSAHEB WANI AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. P. S. Pawar holding for Mr. Tandale Kakasaheb J.

Advocate for Respondents No.3 : Mr. S. S. Dargad holding for Mr.Chapalgaonkar S.G.

...

CORAM : SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 14-06-2019.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned advocate Mr. P. S. Pawar holding for Mr. Tandale Kakasaheb representing applicant, and learned advocate Mr. S. S. Dargad holding for Mr.Chapalgaonkar S.G. representing respondent No.3.

2.

By this application the original claimant intends to get the delay of 256 days condoned. Though respondents No.1 and 2 are served, they are absent. Learned advocate for respondent No.3 submits that, the delay has not been properly explained.

3.

Taking into consideration the reasons stated in para No.4, the delay is condoned. Application stands allowed and disposed of accordingly.

4.

Registry to verify and register the appeal and place it before appropriate Bench.

CA 10707-2018 (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE vjg/-