Bombay High CourtWP/666/2002disposed offdismissed for default

Datta Chhaganrao Shingare v. Union Of India And ORS

2018-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane1 pages

666.02WP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.666 OF 2002 ...

DATTA CHHAGANRAO SHINGARE

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

...

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 24.02.2018 ORDER:

1] On earlier occasion i.e. on 18th August, 2017, none appeared for the petitioner.

2] It appears that sufficient time was granted to the petitioner for amending the Petition, however, no steps were taken. We have noticed that the Advocate appearing for the petitioner was present in the morning session in some other matter. However, when the matter was called out in the morning session, none appeared for the petitioner. Even in the afternoon session, none appears for the petitioner. Hence, the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule stands discharged.

[S.M.GAVHANE] [S.S.SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC