Uttamrao Bhaurao Taur Lrs.Radhakishan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

222.95WP FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 222 OF 1995 UTTAMRAO BHAURAO TAUR LRS.RADHAKISHAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for petitioners: Mr.C.V. Thombre AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.R. Kale ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE, J.

Dated: May 09, 2017 ...

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, in view of the subsequent events occurred after filing this Writ Petition, the Petition has become infructuous. He submits that, the other Writ Petitions having identical challenge have already been disposed of by the High Court. Therefore, he submits that, this Petition may be disposed of as infructuous.

2.

The learned A.G.P. appearing for the

222.95WP respondent/State submits that, he has no objection for disposal of the Petition.

3.

In that view of the matter, without entering into the merits of the contentions raised in the Petition, in the light of statements of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Petition is disposed of as infructuous. Rule stands discharged.

(S.S. SHINDE, J) sga/