← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/209/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Dhanraj Laxman Bhute v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-01-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale2 pages

1 WP208.2019&Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 208 OF 2019 Vilas S/o. Malhari Komatwar Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents..

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 152 OF 2019 Punjab S/o. Sakharam Suradkar Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents..

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 209 OF 2019 Dhanraj S/o. Laxman Bhute Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents..

......

In all the matters:

Mr Anant R. Devakate, Advocate for the petitioner Mr P. S. Patil, AGP for respondent/State .......

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 11TH JANUARY, 2019 ORAL ORDER:

1.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader raises a preliminary objection that, against the order dt. 31.12.2018 passed by the Collector, the petitioner has a remedy before the Maharashtra

2 WP208.2019&Ors.

Administrative Tribunal. The grievance of the petitioners is that, the rules relied by the Collector of 06.06.2017 would not apply to the petitioners. The petitioners can agitate the same before the Tribunal. 2.

In light of the above, with a liberty to approach the Tribunal, the writ petitions are disposed of. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the order of reversion has not yet taken effect. If the petitioners are not yet reverted, they may not be reverted for 10 days from today so as to enable the petitioners to approach the Tribunal. 4.

Needless to state that, on lapse of 10 days from today, the protection granted by this Court shall come to an end. We have not dilated on the merits of the matters. All the contentions in that regard are kept open. No costs.

.

Authenticate copy be given.

[ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde