Sd. Pasha Noor Pasha And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

{1} ca6709.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6709 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 480 OF 2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6715 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 675 OF 2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17113 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 29873 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17114 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 14878 OF 2011 Mr. K. M. Nagarkar, advocate for the Applicants Mr. S. W. Munde, AGP for Respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 11th April, 2023.

PC :

Heard rival submissions.

Respective applicants-claimants, in all these applications, are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned therein which appear to be caused due to their financial crisis.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that there is also circulation delay. The

{2} ca6709.22.odt acquiring body despite service, remained absent. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods mentioned in all these applications, stand condoned subject to the condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay and also for the delay in circulating the matters belatedly.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb