Hamid Gulam Rasool Saheb v. Sayed Sherali Sahebali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 22 SECOND APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2000 HAMID GULAM RASOOL SAHEB

VERSUS

SAYED SHERALI SAHEBALI

CORAM:

VIJAY S.KULKARNI REGISTRAR (JUDL) DATED: 30/11/2016 1.

On perusal of record and proceedings, it appears that the objection is that Advocate Mr.C.R.Deshpande has filed pursis at Flag "A" stating therein that the appellant sole has expired. Thereafter, no steps have been taken by the appellant to remove the objection. There is no leave note filed by the learned Advocate for the appellant for today's date. The appellant is the sole appellant and no steps have been taken to bring on record his L.Rs. I pass following order.

ORDER

The appellant sole Hamid Gulam Rasool Saheb has expired and therefore, the appeal stands abated. REGISTRAR (JUDL) sa127.00(22)