M.Phule Krishi Vidyapith And Another. v. Vijay Dhondu Pawar And Another.

3263.95wp (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3263 OF 1995 M. PHULE KRISHI VIDYAPITH and ANOTHER.

VERSUS

VIJAY DHONDU PAWAR and OTHERS ...

Mr M. N. Navandar, Advocate for petitioners Mr K. P. Rodge, Advocate h/f Mr P. G. Rodge, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr V. V. Kabade, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr K. B. Jadhavar, A.G.P. for respondent No.3 CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATE : 13th January, 2022 PER COURT:

1.

In the cacophony between the Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapeeth and the Maharashtra Animal and Fisheries University, Nagpur, the fact remains that the order passed by the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar on 23/02/1995, which is impugned in the present writ petition is not implemented till date. 2.

On the earlier date of hearing, it was informed that the petitioner Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapeeth stood affiliated / transferred to the Maharashtra Animal and Fisheries University, Nagpur, including petitioner No. 2 Veterinary College.

3263.95wp (2) 3.

Today, the learned Counsel Mr Navandar appear on behalf of the Maharashtra Animal and Fisheries University, Nagpur and make a statement that the record of the proceedings is not traceable in the University. The instructions received by the learned Counsel is to the effect that after 1993, the respondent No.1 never reported to the petitioner No.2 - College, and as such, the direction to make him permanent on the post of 'Lab Technician', is of no consequence.

4.

It is to be noted that, though the order passed by the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar in the year 1995 in favour of respondent No.1, and the College as well as the University were directed to implement the order within three months, it is apparent that respondent No.1 also did not initiate any steps. 5.

Since the petitioners are not armed with any document and record to proceed with the writ petition, the petition deserves a dismissal, since it is pending for adjudication in the this Court since year 1995 viz. almost for a period of 2 1⁄2 decade. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.

(SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) sjk