Young Boys Educational And Industrial Circle Dhule Through President v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1569 OF 2019 Young Boys Educational & Industrial Circle, Dhule Through its President, Habibur Rehman Abdul Majid, Age.62 years, Occu. Pensioner, R/o C/o Islahul Banat Urdu Girls High School and Junior College of Sciences, Aqsa Nagar, Vadjai Raod, Dhule ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra Through it's Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Mumbai 2.

The Deputy Director of Education, Nasik Division, Nasik 3.

The Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Dhule 4.

The Director of Education (Primary) State of Maharashtra, Pune 5.

The Commissioner of Education, State of Maharashtra, Pune.

..RESPONDENTS Mr S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for petitioner;

Mrs M. A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent/State; Mr N. N. Desale, Advocate for respondent No. 3 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2019

ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner is an educational society and has approached this Court by way of present writ petition through its President. A limited grievance is raised in the petition. By inviting our attention to Exhibit - A, it is submitted before us by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner - institute, considering the strength of students and granted sanctioned staff, appointed four persons namely, Taslimunissa Mh. Shaban in June 2007, Taslima Kausar Ajaj Ahmed in June 2007, Shahajadi Bano Habib Ahmed in June 2014 and Afrin Bano Habib-Ur-Rehman in June 2015. 3.

It is further submitted before us that the institute is having required infrastructural facilities and there is increased strength of students as per national growth. Though the proposal of grant of approval to the appointment is submitted to respondents - authorities on 4th January, 2018, till the date of filing the petition, no decision is taken by respondents - authorities and as such, the petitioner is left with no choice and has approached this Court.

4.

This being a limited grievance, the petition is disposed of at admission stage, with directions to the respondents to decide proposal dated 4th January, 2018 as expeditiously as possible and not later than ten (10) weeks from the date of order of this Court.

5.

We make it clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the proposal and we leave assessment of the merit to the respondents - authorities.

6.

With these observations, the petition is disposed of. (S. M. GAVHANE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) Tupe