Vilas Vithal Paul v. Subodhbahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Nandal Ando.

901.WP.1465.95.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1465 OF 1995 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8879 OF 2004 Vilas Vithhal Paul ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Subodh Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Others ..RESPONDENTS ....

Ms. Madhubala B. Gangwal, Advocate holding for Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for petitioner-applicant.

Mr. R.K. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Mr. D.V. Tele, AGP for Respondent No.3.

....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 4th FEBRUARY, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

1.

Ms. Madhubala B. Gangwal, Advocate holding for Mr. Barlinge, Advocate for petitioner submits that despite best efforts, the petitioner is neither contacting him nor is he forwarding any instructions to him about the contention of the Respondent No.4 that the petitioner has taken voluntary retirement and the S.S.DESHPANDE 1 / 2

901.WP.1465.95.doc Respondent No.4 is working in place of the petitioner for the last four years.

2.

Mr. Jadhavar, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.4 reiterates, as was stated earlier on 28.01.2016, that the petitioner has taken voluntary retirement and the Respondent No.4 is now working in place of the petitioner for the last four years. 3.

According to the said statement made above, this petition has became infructuous and is therefore disposed of. Pending civil application would not survive and same is also disposed of. 4.

It is made clear that this petition has been disposed of on the statement made by the Respondent No.4.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) S.S.DESHPANDE 2 / 2