Yamunabai Ashokrao Garud v. Madhukar Laxman Wagh And ANR

sa131.2000 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 SECOND APPEAL NO. 131 OF 2000 WITH CA/1301/2000 IN SA/131/2000 WITH CA/5028/2006 IN SA/131/2000 WITH CA/15467/2017 IN SA/131/2000 YAMUNABAI ASHOKRAO GARUD

VERSUS

MADHUKAR LAXMAN WAGH AND ANR ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shri V.Y. Patil Advocate for Respondents : Mr. B.A. Darakh .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 22nd DECEMBER, 2017 PER COURT:- 1.

Read the compromise pursis. The parties are present in person. They are duly identified by their respective counsel. 2.

The appellant Yamunabai Ashokrao Garud, is present in person and she admits the contents in the compromise pursis. She is also identified by her counsel on record. Thus, the contents of compromise stands verified. The compromise pursis is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

3.

The second appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis. Decree be drawn up in terms of compromise. 4.

All pending civil applications in the second appeal are also disposed of.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/