Sayyad Zubair Ahmad Sayyad Ghaffar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
2024:BHC-AUG:14417-DB 1 62.WP-908-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 908 OF 2024 Sayyad Zubair Ahmad s/o Sayyad Ghaffar Age : 37 years, Occ.: Service R/o : Plot No.25, Gat No.3161, Near Umar Masjid, Madni Nagar, Jamner, Dist. Jalgaon.
...Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary of School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400032.
2.
The Deputy Director of Education, Nashik Division, Nashik.
3.
The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon.
4.
Anjuman-E-Taraqqui-E-Tali, Islampura, Tq. Jamner, Dist. Jalgaon.
Through its President/Secretary.
...Respondents
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M.N. Shaikh h/f Mr. Kazi S.S. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. D.R. Korde ...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 15 JULY 2024 PER COURT :
.
Heard.
2.
The petitioner who is stated to be serving with respondent no.4
2 62.WP-908-2024.doc which is a minority institute, is aggrieved by the fact that for want of his clearing a TET examination his name has not been included in Shalarth Pranali.
3.
Admittedly, the issue regarding applicability of the condition/ qualification of TET to the staff of the minority institute is pending before the Supreme Court. This Court has been, for the time being directing the names of similarly placed teachers of the minority institute to be included in the Shalarth Pranali, subject to the final outcome of the matter before the Supreme Court. 4.
The Writ Petition is partly allowed. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. The respondent no.2/Deputy Director of Education, Nashik Division, Nashik, shall consider the petitioner's case for including his name in the Shalarth Pranali independent of the fact that he has not cleared the TET. The petitioner shall file affidavit undertaking to forgo such benefits and if called upon to do so to repay the salaries if so directed depending upon the final outcome of the decision before the Supreme Court. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] Najeeb..